Rossen Reports on Telemarketing and Home Security Alarms

Vodpod videos no longer available.

VMS Alarms says that they only call people who have “opted in”. Indeed, CEO Jay Gotra admits to using many third-party lead generators who make the initial call, identify a consumer that says they’re interested, and who is then paid a fee by VMS (and others) for the information. The alarm dealers like VMS then contact the customer on this “opt in” basis. I’ll have more on this later, but there doesn’t appear to be any exemption from requiring the caller to identify the company and the purpose of the call. The Tom calls simply don’t meet this requirement. “Home Protection” appears to be a generic pseudonym, used so the lead can be sold to any alarm dealer. Anything that happens after the purposeful omission of the company’s identity is not relevant.


One Response to Rossen Reports on Telemarketing and Home Security Alarms

  1. Bruce says:

    When the initial call is illegal it remains illegal, and one is entitled to learn the true identity of the caller, ie., name address and telephone #, and answering some questions to learn your identity never ever = “consent.” There is no “consent” for the caller is hiding behind a spoofed #, generic company name, and generic salesperson. Sorry brah, oopps, VMS, maximum Security, GPS Security, let’s see if you have the cajones to show up in court and try to sell a jury your snake oil.

%d bloggers like this: